blog advertising is good for you
Fuck yeah, feminists! - dersiteagent: fuckyeahfeminists: barbitone: ...
fuckyeahfeminists

A place to celebrate anything anti-oppression, anti-kyriarchy, anti-hate and pro-equality.

Run by two feminists who try to link to and reblog anything that is relevant to feminists today (almost anything).



Pardon our dust

Please bear with us while we transition to a new theme! - Wagatwe

AD

Tag Cloud

dersiteagent:

fuckyeahfeminists:

barbitone:

fuckyeahfeminists:

rhrealitycheck:

Sorry to bust your bubble, but a new study shows that sex doesn’t burn as many calories as we previously thought.

sorry ya’ll. gunna have to stick to running to workout.

If licking a stamp burns 10 calories, then I have no idea what kind of sex the New England Journal of Medicine is having… -_-

how in the world does LICKING a stamp burn calories?!
from the study:

A man in his early-to-mid-30s might expend approximately 21 calories during sexual intercourse. Of course, he would have spent roughly one third that amount of energy just watching television, so the incremental benefit of one bout of sexual activity with respect to energy expended is plausibly on the order of 14 calories”

so ya’ll can try and hold on to your lofty dreams that you burn SO MANY calories while having sex. But it really doesn’t take that much energy for the average session. Especially if you weigh less than the average man in his 30s. 
Also, this is average. It doesn’t mean you dont burn more (or less!)

IM LAUGHING BECAUSE CELERY HAS NO CALORIES

Sorry, pal. Celery has calories. 19 in a cup.

dersiteagent:

fuckyeahfeminists:

barbitone:

fuckyeahfeminists:

rhrealitycheck:

Sorry to bust your bubble, but a new study shows that sex doesn’t burn as many calories as we previously thought.

sorry ya’ll. gunna have to stick to running to workout.

If licking a stamp burns 10 calories, then I have no idea what kind of sex the New England Journal of Medicine is having… -_-

how in the world does LICKING a stamp burn calories?!

from the study:

A man in his early-to-mid-30s might expend approximately 21 calories during sexual intercourse. Of course, he would have spent roughly one third that amount of energy just watching television, so the incremental benefit of one bout of sexual activity with respect to energy expended is plausibly on the order of 14 calories”

so ya’ll can try and hold on to your lofty dreams that you burn SO MANY calories while having sex. But it really doesn’t take that much energy for the average session. Especially if you weigh less than the average man in his 30s. 

Also, this is average. It doesn’t mean you dont burn more (or less!)

IM LAUGHING BECAUSE CELERY HAS NO CALORIES

Sorry, pal. Celery has calories. 19 in a cup.

(via davesprite)

Leave a comment View 414 Notes
  1. jeveuxjustunedernieredanse reblogged this from cynical-as-hell
  2. or-even-cured reblogged this from highfiveshiningstrike and added:
    I feel like this must say something about average “sex” and average session length.
  3. lanielion reblogged this from highfiveshiningstrike
  4. highfiveshiningstrike reblogged this from cynical-as-hell
  5. g--spot reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  6. gryffindorfeminist reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  7. timeschangebutweremainthesame reblogged this from foodfeminismandfalloutboy and added:
    I’m sorry but to only burn 14 calories you must be doing something very wrong.
  8. foodfeminismandfalloutboy reblogged this from wernickes-area and added:
    Boo. :(
  9. sleasbian reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  10. i-dont-need-anyone-now reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  11. wherethedevildontstay reblogged this from liverightloverightfuckright and added:
    If sex doesn’t burn calories, nothing does.
  12. lilkittay reblogged this from spiritscraft and added:
    Sounds like the average man in his 30’s is really LAZY. I think bottoms or tops would affect who is burning more...
  13. howdoyouspellbombshell reblogged this from jadelyn and added:
    Wow
  14. temencmoth reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  15. effingunicorns reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  16. untamed-souls reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  17. inter-locution reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  18. damalasi reblogged this from random-nexus
  19. spiritscraft reblogged this from superterrifichappyfuntime and added:
    Amen!
  20. cookiediesel reblogged this from draodoir-mna and added:
    Any study using calories in reference to the human body is scientifically suspect to begin with. The calorie is a...
  21. freibiergesicht reblogged this from bride-of-bucky and added:
    lol this whole thread also no one made the joke about 30 something guys being lazy in bed huh that seemed ripe for the...
  22. lesassinator reblogged this from draodoir-mna
  23. tinfoilstork reblogged this from laudanine
  24. elhombre reblogged this from liverightloverightfuckright
  25. superterrifichappyfuntime reblogged this from spiritscraft and added:
    Wait, there’s a standard “average” concerning sex?!? What exactly is it? How long? Are my girlfriend and I above...
  26. solitaryandbewildered reblogged this from ifyouaretobloom
  27. im-meenah-peixes reblogged this from fuckyeahfeminists
  28. jadelyn reblogged this from notsoscairdycat and added:
    Re-reblogging because there ^^^^ is a woman with excellent priorities.
  29. dreams-of-faith reblogged this from spiritscraft and added:
    I second this last comment. Why the hell are you people settling for “average sex??
blog comments powered by Disqus
fly to Top
Athenability
Design by Athenability
Powered by Tumblr